@article{Voronovska_2018, title={DISCUSSION ANALYSIS AND LINGUISTICS OF THE TEXT: RELATIONSHIP BETTER}, url={https://tdp-journal.com/index.php/journal/article/view/36}, abstractNote={<p>The transition to complex forms of social activity makes it possible to&nbsp;master those means of language that underlie the highest level of knowledge&nbsp;of theoretical thinking. This transition from the sensory to the rational leads&nbsp;to the solution of the problem of the connection between text and discourse&nbsp;and is that essential moment that combines the most diverse concepts of&nbsp;discourse and approaches to discursive analysis: from text to meaning, from&nbsp;the logical structure of discourse to its style characteristics, from the general&nbsp;properties of language before lingvospecific features.&nbsp;The article reveals and argued various scientific approaches to the&nbsp;interpretation of the concepts of discursive analysis and linguistics of the text,&nbsp;as well as their correlation and delineation within the framework of the&nbsp;linguistic paradigm.&nbsp;The independent subject of the study is text for linguistics of text, science,&nbsp;which is closely related to discursive analysis. The problem of the ratio of&nbsp;discursive analysis and linguistics of the text is complicated, however, by&nbsp;ambiguous understanding of the tasks of both disciplines and the lack of clear&nbsp;differentiation of the concepts of «text» and «discourse». Because of this, there&nbsp;is a problem of affinity - is there a discursive analysis of the continuation of&nbsp;linguistics of the text, does linguistics of the text itself as an independent&nbsp;discipline arose as a result of increased attention of linguistics to the&nbsp;phenomenon of human communication in general, and to the communicative&nbsp;function of speech directly, became a derivative of discursive analysis? In&nbsp;connection with this, the complex history of the development of the relations&nbsp;of discursive analysis and linguistics of the text, in which conditionally&nbsp;distinguished three stages, characterized by their own approach to the relation&nbsp;of text and discourse.&nbsp;Attention was also paid to the essence of the «pragmatic coup», which&nbsp;led to the crucial move of research interests from the issues of the intra-textual&nbsp;organization to the processes of textual and semantic construction. The fear&nbsp;of losing the object of linguistics of the text became the reason for the consistent&nbsp;separation of the concepts of «text» and «discourse», first of all, with the&nbsp;parameters «statics, system» (text) – «dynamics, procedurality» (discourse).&nbsp;It is also incomplete, according to the author, to contrast the text and&nbsp;discourse, based on the greater significance of the text. This approach does&nbsp;not take into account the fact that the text received by the recipient is the&nbsp;starting point for its discursive activity, and semantic completeness or integrity&nbsp;of the text is formed in the process of interaction between the author and the&nbsp;reader in the text field. Text and discourse are closely related and define each&nbsp;other.</p> <p><br>Key words: discursive analysis, text linguistics, communication,&nbsp;pragmatic turn, functional theory of text, theory of activity, theory of speech&nbsp;acts, communicant, interpreter</p&gt;}, number={27}, journal={Theoretical and didactic philology}, author={Voronovska, Liudmyla}, year={2018}, month={Jun.}, pages={4-12} }